As the philosopher Immanuel Kant the age of forty, he stated that from then a character acquires and this is established on principles (principles). Maxims for him basic rules of behavior and thought and expression are rational action. The character is, according to Kant expression of the will and the good will to Kant it is in many of his writings.
to Kant's works include "Critique of Pure Reason, Critique of Practical Reason, Critique of Judgement," but also of his philosophical essay "Perpetual Peace" in which he has a peaceful world order in mind and thus apart from the mind, which lead by example, the policy-makers of his time.
The philosopher wrote with Schiller and there was an intellectual connection to spruce, which owed much to the great East Prussia, aroused the anger, however, because of critical comments.
Kant was an exceptional man, a person with great ethical will, which we are much indebted in particular to the knowledge of the categorical imperative have. The categorical imperative is:
"Handle so that the maxim of your will at any time at the same time could serve as a universal law. "
As the eminent thinkers of two centuries ago on the 02/12/1804 with the words" passed away, it's good, "he added with his posterity ! ideas the key into the hand of a real paradise on earth
"thinking with Immanuel Kant" deals conceptually with the meaning of life
The booklet is divided into chapters. "Your power "," your limit "," Your task, "" Your performance, "Beauty and Art", "Women and Love" and "wisdom of life."
A foreword by Wolfgang Kraus and a multi-page text at the end of the book by Otto A. Böhmer, entitled: ". It's never too late to be wise Life of Immanuel Kant" make it easier for the philosophical thoughts Kant to understand and classify.
Imagine today I want only the most famous sentence of Kant::
"Act so that the maxim of your will at any time at the same time could serve as a universal law."
This sentence should anyone, even those on the Internet day and night with stealth road and are protected by those "other difficult life, who really own. The questions that arise are: Do I want that others treat me as I with you What if all act like myself? What drives me to always to look for hair in the soup? I steer by that zealous activity on my inner emptiness? Why I play the sniper? What gives me the long term if I verbally made fun of destroying one author put the death blow, I delight in my words hurt border and enjoy it, as these words an author sleepless nights ? Prepare It brings satisfaction or joy? Do I want that with me so shabby deal, and if I do not want to know why I do it to others? Because I'm mentally ill? Because I'm angry or want to be angry? "What is appealing it to be evil?
These are the questions that should make anybody who was bothered by his destruction of others in the network. Mind you, it's not about constructive criticism, but the authors focused attempt to destroy them.
I watch for a long time, how to work on different platforms in the network with authors, such as young Authors will be driven into the Schreibblokade, books that are torn apart, not the contents are tattered because of, but because you want to increase by the slating, even in the gang, in which one has brought to life dererlei goal. Small minds feel the power they have when they move up as the Plebs in the Roman arenas, the thumb and down and can feed themselves with this power. Do these small minds ever made clear how much passion in a book infected, how much work and struggle with yourself, how much sacrifice, how much fear, how much concern?
No one can thus creating a good name, by the work of other denigrates. Many believe this, but they are mistaken. Anyone who loves books and wants to promote education tries to keep others from reading not, but to motivate them.
Kant says: "The greatest danger to people in their dealings with each other is. Others are wrong to do" (quote p. 85).
Before the staff complacent about the work of another break, you should think long and hard about. What moves me to a slating? Will I have on my wicked words ? Grazing Will I raise myself? What is it about me with my actions? Is it not more sensible books that we find objectionable, to put aside and instead of reading a book that we like to advertise?
Not everyone writes like Thomas Mann, but are therefore condemn all others?
Not everyone writes like Thomas Mann, but are therefore condemn all others?
recommended.
0 comments:
Post a Comment